Early Organization
The first organized attempt to control the fur trade
in New France was undertaken by Francis Grave and Captain Chauvin.
In 1599 they acquired a monopoly from Henry IV and tried to establish
a colony at the mouth of the Saguenay River(Tadoussac, Quebec). French
explorers (and Coureur des bois), (Étienne Brûlé,
Samuel de Champlain, Radisson and Groseilliers, La Salle, Le Sueur)
while seeking routes through the continent, established relationships
with
Amerindians
and continued to expand the trade of fur pelts for items considered
'common' by the Europeans. Fur (especially beaver) was prized and very
expensive in European markets. In 1613 Henry Christiansen and Adrian
Block headed expeditions to establish fur trade relationships with
the Mohawks and Mohicans. By 1614 the Dutch were sending vessels to
Manhattan to secure large returns from fur trading. Radisson and Groseilliers,
bitter with the rejection of their first big unlicenced fur haul, pulled
the British into the trade in 1668. They convinced businessmen in Boston,
Massachusetts and Charles II that there was a tremendous amount of
money to be made in the best fur country north of New France. This
was the spark that would become the first commercial corporation in
North America and largest fur trading company in the world, The Hudson's
Bay Company. Meanwhile, in the English southern colonies (established
around 1670), the deerskin trade was established based on the export
hub of Charleston, South Carolina. Word spread amongst Native hunters
that the Europeans would exchange pelts for European-manufactured goods
that were highly desired in native communities. Axe heads, knives,
awls, fish hooks, cloth of various type and color, woolen blankets,
linen shirts, kettles, jewelry, glass beads
, muskets, ammunition and
powder were some of the major items exchanged on a 'per pelt' basis.
The trading posts also introduced many types of alcohol (especially
brandy and rum) for trade. European traders flocked to the continent
and made huge profits off the exchange. A metal axe head, for example,
was exchanged for one beaver pelt (also called a 'beaver blanket').
The same pelt could fetch enough to buy a dozens of axe heads in England,
making the fur trade extremely profitable for the European nations.
Socio-economic ties
Often, the political benefits of the fur trade became
more important than the economic aspects. Trade was a way to forge
alliances and maintain good relations between different cultures and
as marriages were the currency of diplomatic ties of that time, the
trade was the beginning of the Métis (mixed European and Native
American parentage). Consequently, there was much rivalry between different
European-American governments for control of the fur trade with the
various native societies. Native Americans sometimes based decisions
of which side to support in time of war upon which side provided them
with the best trade goods in an honest manner. Because trade was so
politically important, it was often heavily regulated in hopes (often
futile) of preventing abuse. Unscrupulous traders sometimes cheated
natives by plying them with alcohol during the transaction, which subsequently
aroused resentment and often resulted in violence.
After the United States became independent, trading with
Native Americans in the U.S. was nominally regulated by the Indian
Intercourse Act, first passed on July 22, 1790. The Bureau of Indian
Affairs issued licenses to trade in the Indian Territory, which in
1834 consisted of most of the United States west of the Mississippi
River, where mountain men and traders from Mexico freely operated.
The fur trade came to a close as game was depleted by
over hunting. John Jacob Astor (who controlled the largest American
fur trading company) recognized that all fur-bearing animals were becoming
scarce and retired in 1834. Expanding European settlement displaced
native communities from the best hunting grounds, and demand for furs
subsided as European fashion trends shifted. The Native American's
lifestyle was forever altered by the trade, in order to continue obtaining
European goods on which they had become dependent and to pay off their
debts, they often resorted to selling land to the European settlers,
which caused resentment on the side of the aboriginals (Native Americans)
that would help ignite future wars.